As leaders, knowing ourselves is an important aspect of
leadership that is too often overlooked.
Do you have a good understand of what ‘type’ of person you are? Are you an extrovert or an introvert? Do you like working with people or with
things? Are you more a thinker or a
doer? Have you put any thought into the
fact that the people you often like to work with or be around have similar
traits to you, and that the people you don’t like to work with have different
traits? This is usually all lumped into
the broad concept of “personality types” or “interaction styles”, of which here
are many models. While many people may
get the chance to take a personality/interaction test at work or maybe school,
not everyone gets the chance.
“Social Styles” was first developed by David Merrill in the
1960s, and is also based on Jung’s theories (like MBTI), but here the focus is
on individual’s outer styles or their interactions if you will, similar to
DISC. This was later enunciated in Personal Styles and Effective Performance (1981) by David Merrill and Roger
Reid. Another set of researchers (Robert
& Dorothy Bolton) based their own “People Styles” on this work, but with
some differences with the addition of what they call ‘style flex’, which is
about how people can modify, or flex, their behavior to be more compatible with
people of differing interaction styles.
This was covered first in their work Social Style/Management Style (1984), but has been more or less replaced by their later and more accessible
work: People Styles at Work and Beyond (2009, 2nd edition). Training based on Merrill’s work is sold thru
his company Tracom and the Boltons’ thru their company
Ridge Associates. I
would recommend the “People Style” work as a more recent and readable intro to
the subject, plus it includes a basic test to determine your style. But check out Tracom for some interesting
reports that show how “Social Styles” can work with other leadership
methodologies.
In Social Styles, people are put into one of 4 styles:
Analytical- thinking oriented
Driving- action oriented
Amiable- relationship oriented
Expressive- intuition oriented
They are oriented around 2 axis. An assertiveness axis on the horizontal, that
ranges from ASK to TELL. And a
(emotional) responsiveness axis on the vertical, that ranges from CONTROL to
EMOTE. Keep in mind that these are
scales or axis. You can be anywhere
along either of those scales! Putting
this all together, you have:
As with DISC, we also find that these styles pairing up,
again tied into those vertical and horizontal scales. As it relates to the horizontal scale:
Analytical
and Driving are both TASK oriented, they like emotional control. They are typically cool, independent,
disciplined and use facts.
Amiable and
Expressive are RELATIONSHIP oriented, they emote. They use opinions, are usually undisciplined,
warm, and approachable.
But also, these styles are also paired up along the
vertical:
Driving and
Expressive are part of the TELL side of assertiveness, so they like fast
action, taking risks, and being competitive.
Analytical
and Amiable are part of the ASK side of assertiveness, so they prefer slow
action, avoiding risks, and being cooperative.
You will fall into one of these four areas mainly, but can
have aspects of the other 3. Again, this
is due to those 2 axis: Assertiveness and Responsiveness.
Of the three personality profiles we've looked at, Social
Styles is the one I’m most familiar with, as Alpha Phi Omega has incorporated
it into our self-leadership workshop of our LD program. I find it the most useful of the three we've
looked at.
No comments:
Post a Comment